<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hardware on myvirtualcloud.net</title><link>https://myvirtualcloud.net/tags/hardware/</link><description>Recent content in Hardware on myvirtualcloud.net</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Andre Leibovici</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myvirtualcloud.net/tags/hardware/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Expensive storage array not required for VDI?</title><link>https://myvirtualcloud.net/expensive-storage-array-not-required-for-vdi/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://myvirtualcloud.net/expensive-storage-array-not-required-for-vdi/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Lately I have been questioning myself whether VDI really need expensive enterprise storage arrays (SAN) to run VDI environments. The points I raise here may not apply to all organizations but certainly there are aspects to be observed.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Assuming User Profiles are hosted in a file server, why couldn’t virtual desktops run from the server local storage?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>